The two largest social
networks are becoming more similar, as they borrow each other's
features, and search for profit. Facebook and Twitter were
different places to socialize online. One was public to the world, the other
(mostly) just between friends.
One was a place for news from your social
circle, the other more about public events and discussion. One was dominated by
images and multimedia, the other text-centred
Over the past year those
distinctions have broken down. In their rush to compete and make more money,
Facebook and Twitter are converging on
the same set of features.
Facebook’s
recent bites from Twitter are obvious. It introduced a new “public
feed” that compiles all public posts, similar to Twitter’s
feed. Last month Facebook began highlighting “trending”
topics to its users, as Twitter has long done. That feature was built on top of
another feature new to Facebook but originating with Twitter, that of hashtags
people use to label their comments with particular topics. Sources say Facebook
also has staff who court celebrities and help them build followings on the
site, an attempt to combat the fact Twitter has become the default place for
public figures and their fans to connect.
Going the other way, Twitter
recently introduced a redesign of how conversations are displayed. Abandoning
its commitment to showing everything in reverse chronological order, in favor
of the chronological convention (which Facebook adopts). Last year Twitter
introduced a method called "cards"
that prominently display text, images, video,ads or other media linked
to in a tweet and sidestep Twitter’s 140 character limit
on posts. Twitter’s cards look and behave similarly to the way Facebook
embeds media and ads in its feed. Most recently, this week Twitter purchased
mobile ad company MoPub, likely to combat Facebook’s
progress in mobile advertising.
Facebook and Twitter’s
collision course seems more driven by their rush to make money from ads than an
effort to fulfill the needs of their
users.
It could help their smaller
competitors, though.
The dominant sites merging
into one similar, ad-dominated mass leaves more space for them to innovate, and
could make people more willing to try out different ideas about socializing
over the Internet.
We are definitely watching,
their competitors too.
No comments:
Post a Comment